• Business
  • Crypto
  • Investing
  • Lifestyle
  • Money
  • Glossary
    • A
    • B
    • C
    • D
    • E
Search
Sign in
Welcome! Log into your account
Forgot your password? Get help
Password recovery
Recover your password
A password will be e-mailed to you.
Finance Reference
Quotes by TradingView
  • Business
    • The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Social Media Marketing
      What Is The Importance Of Web Design For Your Business?
      3 Factors That Make Your Company Vulnerable to Financial Fraud
      Ways Businesses Can Survive Tough Economic Times
      Product Labeling and Packaging Tips for Businesses
  • Crypto
    • Crypto Market Indexes: Your Ticket to Making Money Through Crypto
      10 Benefits Of Using Crypto Debit Cards
      Everything You Need to Know About Metamask
      Anti-Money Laundering Best Practices for Crypto Firms
      You Should Invest in Bitcoin and Here’s Why
  • Investing
    • Investing vs. Online Gambling: What’s The Difference?
      Comparing Stock Market Performance vs. Real Estate Investments Through History
      How to Fast Track a Retirement Plan in Your Middle-Age
      How Much of Your IRA Should Be in Precious Metals
      What To Know Prior to Investing in Gold and Silver
  • Lifestyle
    • How to Choose an Affordable Health Care Plan
      Interesting Facts about Bet9ja
      The Pros and Cons of Anti-Obesity Medication for Weight Loss
      Is It Worth Extending Your Car Warranty? 12/14
      List Of All Vegetables That Dogs Can Eat
  • Money
    • Efficient Funding Opportunities for New and Old Social Businesses
      10 of the Best Funding Sources For Medical Offices In 2023
      Invoice-to-Pay: Automate Your Invoice Payment Cycle
      How To Take Care Of Home Budget During The Winter?
      8 Ways to Improve Your Personal Finances
  • Glossary
    • Overhead Ratio
      What Is an Overhead Ratio?
      Non-Executive Director
      Non-Executive Director: Roles and Responsibilities
      Mothballing
      What is Mothballing & When Should You Do It?
      Night Depository
      What is a Night Depository?
      Pooled Funds
      Exploring the Benefits and Risks of Pooled Funds: A Comprehensive Guide
      AllABCDE
  • Glossary
  • P

PEG Ratio

By
rjonesx
-

wikipediaSource: Wikipedia
Last Sourced: 2021-02-01
This Article has been Edited for Accessibility

PEG ratio

The ‘PEG ratio’ (price/earnings to growth ratio) is a valuation metric for determining the relative trade-off between the price of a stock, the earnings generated per share (EPS), and the company’s expected growth.

In general, the P/E ratio is higher for a company with a higher growth rate. Thus, using just the P/E ratio would make high-growth companies appear overvalued relative to others. It is assumed that by dividing the P/E ratio by the earnings growth rate, the resulting ratio is better for comparing companies with different growth rates.

The PEG ratio is considered to be a convenient approximation. It was originally developed by Mario Farina who wrote about it in his 1969 Book, A Beginner’s Guide To Successful Investing In The Stock Market. It was later popularized by Peter Lynch, who wrote in his 1989 book One Up on Wall Street that “The P/E ratio of any company that’s fairly priced will equal its growth rate”, i.e., a fairly valued company will have its PEG equal to 1. The formula can be supported theoretically by reference to the Sum of perpetuities method.

Basic formula

The growth rate is expressed as a percent value, and should use real growth only, to correct for inflation. E.g. if a company is growing at 30% a year, in real terms, and has a P/E of 30, it would have a PEG of 1. A lower ratio is “better” (cheaper) and a higher ratio is “worse” (expensive). The P/E ratio used in the calculation may be projected or trailing, and the annual growth rate may be the expected growth rate for the next year or the next five years.

As an indicator

PEG is a widely employed indicator of a stock’s possible true value. Similar to PE ratios, a lower PEG means that the stock is undervalued more. It is favored by many over the price/earnings ratio because it also accounts for growth.

The PEG ratio of 1 is sometimes said to represent a fair trade-off between the values of cost and the values of growth, indicating that a stock is reasonably valued given the expected growth. A crude analysis suggests that companies with PEG values between 0 and 1 may provide higher returns.

A PEG Ratio can also be a negative number if a stock’s present income figure is negative (negative earnings), or if future earnings are expected to drop (negative growth). PEG ratios calculated from negative present earnings are viewed with skepticism as almost meaningless, other than as an indication of high investment risk.

Criticism

The PEG ratio is commonly used and provided by numerous sources of financial and stock information. Despite its wide use, the PEG ratio is only a rough rule of thumb. Criticisms of the PEG ratio include that it is an oversimplified ratio that fails to usefully relate the price/earnings ratio to growth because it fails to factor in return on equity (ROE) or the required return factor (T).

When the PEG is quoted in public sources it makes a great deal of difference whether the earnings used in calculating the PEG is the past year’s EPS, the estimated future year’s EPS, or even selected analysts’ speculative estimates of growth over the next five years. Use of the coming year’s expected growth rate is considered preferable as the most reliable of the future-looking estimates. Yet which growth rate was selected for calculating a particular published PEG ratio may not be clear, or may require a close reading of the footnotes for the given figure.

The PEG ratio’s validity is particularly questionable when used to compare companies expecting high growth with those expecting low-growth, or to compare companies with high P/E with those with a low P/E. It is more apt to be considered when comparing so-called growth companies (those growing earnings significantly faster than the market).

Growth rate numbers are expected to come from an impartial source. This may be from an analyst, whose job it is to be objective, or the investor’s own analysis. Management is not impartial and it is assumed that their statements have a bit of puffery, going from a bit optimistic to completely implausible. This is not always true, since some managers tend to predict modest results only to have things come out better than claimed. A prudent investor should investigate for himself whether the estimates are reasonable, and what should be used to compare the stock price.

PEG calculations based on five-year growth estimates are especially subject to over-optimistic growth projections by analysts, which on average are not achieved, and to discounting the risk of outright loss of invested capital.

Investors may prefer the PEG ratio because it explicitly puts a value on the expected growth in earnings of a company. The PEG ratio can offer a suggestion of whether a company’s high P/E ratio reflects an excessively high stock price or is a reflection of promising growth prospects for the company.

The PEG ratio is less appropriate for measuring companies without high growth. Large, well-established companies, for instance, may offer dependable dividend income, but little opportunity for growth.

A company’s growth rate is an estimate. It is subject to the limitations of projecting future events. Future growth of a company can change due to any number of factors: market conditions, expansion setbacks, and hype of investors. Also, the convention that “PEG=1” is appropriate is somewhat arbitrary and considered a rule-of-thumb metric. .

The simplicity and convenience of calculating PEG leaves out several important variables. First, the absolute company growth rate used in the PEG does not account for the overall growth rate of the economy, and hence an investor must compare a stock’s PEG to average PEG’s across its industry and the entire economy to get any accurate sense of how competitive a stock is for investment. A low (attractive) PEG in times of high growth in the entire economy may not be particularly impressive when compared to other stocks, and vice versa for high PEG’s in periods of slow growth or recession.

In addition, company growth rates that are much higher than the economy’s growth rate are unstable and vulnerable to any problems the company may face that would prevent it from keeping its current rate. Therefore, a higher-PEG stock with a steady, sustainable growth rate (compared to the economy’s growth) can often be a more attractive investment than a low-PEG stock that may happen to just be on a short-term growth “streak”. A sustained higher-than-economy growth rate over the years usually indicates a highly profitable company, but can also indicate a scam, especially if the growth is a flat percentage no matter how the rest of the economy fluctuates (as was the case for several years for returns in Bernie Madoff’s Ponzi scheme).

Finally, the volatility of highly speculative and risky stocks, which have low price/earnings ratios due to their very low price, is also not corrected for in PEG calculations. These stocks may have low PEG’s due to a very low short-term (~1 year) PE ratio (e.g. 100% growth rate from $1 to $2 /stock) that does not indicate any guarantee of maintaining future growth or even solvency.

Further Reading

  • PE ratios, PEG ratios, and estimating the implied expected rate of return on equity capital – meridian.allenpress.com [PDF]
  • Adjusting P/E ratios by growth and risk: the PERG ratio – www.emerald.com [PDF]
  • Does the PEG ratio rank stocks according to the market's expected rate of return on equity capital? – papers.ssrn.com [PDF]
  • Market Inefficiencies and Pricing Heuristics: Evidence from the PEG Ratio. – search.ebscohost.com [PDF]
  • The use of price-to-earnings-to-growth (PEG) ratios to predict share performance on the JSE – www.ingentaconnect.com [PDF]
  • Financial policy and speculative runs with a crawling peg: Argentina 1979–1981 – www.sciencedirect.com [PDF]
  • PEG investing strategy: A revisit – www.jstor.org [PDF]
  • Analyzing the Relationship between Common Return on Investment Based on PEG Strategy – www.indianjournals.com [PDF]
Previous articleABX index
Next articleObamanomics
rjonesx

RELATED ARTICLESMORE FROM AUTHOR

Overhead Ratio

What Is an Overhead Ratio?

Non-Executive Director

Non-Executive Director: Roles and Responsibilities

Mothballing

What is Mothballing & When Should You Do It?

EDITOR PICKS

Per Stirpes vs Per Capita

SPX vs SPY: Which is Better for Trading Options on the S&P 500?

Joint Supply

FAAMG Stocks

Obsolete Inventory

Quarter (Q1, Q2, Q3, Q4)

Latest

Investing vs. Online Gambling: What’s The Difference?

Comparing Stock Market Performance vs. Real Estate Investments Through History

How to Choose an Affordable Health Care Plan

How to Fast Track a Retirement Plan in Your Middle-Age

Efficient Funding Opportunities for New and Old Social Businesses

Interesting Facts about Bet9ja

  • A
  • B
  • C
  • D
  • E
  • F
  • G
  • H
  • I
  • J
  • K
  • L
  • M
  • N
  • O
  • P
  • Q
  • R
  • S
  • T
  • U
  • V
  • W
  • X
  • Y
  • Z
  • About
  • Accessibility
  • Privacy
  • Sitemap